Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy
The purpose of the journal. Publication of carefully selected original scientific papers in all areas of theoretical and applied research in mathematics, computer science and mechanics.

The objectives of the journal:
• publication of articles on promising, including new domestic, topics and areas in international science in order to involve students, young teachers, and staff of the Research Institute of Kazakhstan in these studies;
• implementation of the Messages of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the preparation and effective participation of Kazakhstan in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and mass training of highly qualified IT specialists;
• accumulation of experience in publishing direct-purpose Carrier articles adapted for immediate use in the development of Mathematics and Computer Science in Kazakhstan;
• providing a scientific platform for the journal to consolidate new ideas in the international space in detail and discuss them;
• The journal welcomes the publication of materials on school mathematics topics (based on the experience of world-class mathematicians of the Soviet period);
• raising the level of scientific articles in the country through the systematic work of the Editorial Board of the journal with the authors on the developed journals
Subject area: mathematics, computer science, mechanics.
Languages of publications: Kazakh, Russian, English.
Frequency: 4 times a year.
Archiving. Electronic versions of the scientific journal are provided to the National Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise for the formation of the fund and inclusion in the electronic library. The journal archives materials in Elibrary.ru since 2019.
Terms of publication. All submitted to the editorial office of the journal "Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilev Eurasian National University. Mathematics series. Computer science. Mechanics" manuscripts undergo mandatory anonymous peer review. Based on the reviews received, the editorial board of the journal makes a final decision.

Процедура рассмотрения статей:
1. 1. The manuscript sent by the author is submitted to the editorial office of the journal (two versions of the manuscript, one of which should not contain information about the authors (full name, place of work, information about the authors). Specialist of the Department of Scientific Publications and Scientometric Resources responsible for the journal (editorial department) - the journal manager checks the manuscript for compliance with technical requirements. Together with the manuscript, the author sends to the editorial office of the journal a cover letter (cover letter template link) about the independent nature of the submitted manuscript, agreement with the verification of the article for plagiarism, inclusion in various databases and information systems, including full-text versions, in case of publication and granting exclusive rights to the publisher.
2. The journal manager checks the manuscript for independent execution through the licensed automatic plagiarism verification system (https://antiplagiat.enu.kz /). Based on the results of automatic verification of the manuscript for plagiarism, a complete electronic verification report is uploaded. Articles that have not received a satisfactory result (the threshold percentage of originality is 65%) are not accepted for further consideration. The journal manager notifies the main author/contributor about this for correspondence.
3. The manager of the journal sends the article that has passed the required threshold of originality to the editor-in-chief (responsible editor (deputy editor-in-chief) in the direction). The editor-in-chief (executive editor (deputy editor-in-chief) in the field) reviews the article for compliance with the subject of the journal. In case of non-compliance, the editorial board of the journal sends the author a letter justifying the refusal to publish. On average, the initial review of an article takes 2 weeks.
4. The editor-in-chief (responsible editor in the field) determines the reviewer, scientist or specialist on the relevant topic for each article that has passed the initial selection.
5. The journal manager sends the manuscript with a full plagiarism check report to the reviewer in order to determine the possibility of publishing the article in the journal.
6. The journal uses a double-blind review procedure, that is, when the editorial board does not disclose the names of reviewers and authors. The reviewer provides the editorial board with a reasoned review of the article, including the relevance of the topic under study, the author's contribution to the scientific field, and the level of the results obtained. All reviews contain a recommendation for the publication of the article (with or without modifications) or its rejection. All reviews are submitted to the editorial office of the journal.
7. In case of receipt of a review for revision, the author must provide the corrected version of the article as soon as possible. The edited version of the article is sent to the reviewer for reconsideration. This process is repeated until the final decision of the reviewer on the article is received. In case of agreement with the reviewer's comments, but an unfair approach to correcting them (after the third submission of the manuscript without completely eliminating the comments), the manuscript is rejected. In case of disagreement with the reviewer's comments, the author/authors send a letter with justification to the editor-in-chief of the journal. The editor-in-chief, having considered the appeal of the author/ authors, makes a decision.
8. All reviews and the decision of the editorial board on the article are sent to the main author (or the author for correspondence) specified in the metadata when submitting the article. All materials on the article (the final version of the article, reviews, plagiarism report and other documents, if any) are submitted to the meeting of the editorial board. The decision on the possibility of publishing an article in the journal is made by the editorial board of the journal based on the reviews of reviewers. Articles that have received a negative review and rejected by the editorial board will not be accepted for reconsideration. In case of disputes, the final decision on the articles is made by the editor-in-chief of the journal. On average, the decision to publish is made within 8 months.
9. Publication is carried out on a first-come, first-served basis as soon as the material is ready. The editorial board has the right to form a queue in accordance with the headings of upcoming issues.
After determining the content of the issue, the manager organizes the proofreading of the texts of articles (Kazakh, Russian, English) and the layout of the journal.